Propose a collaboration
One page, one question, one clear ask. Sam reads every brief personally — no form funnel, no sales call.
Sector 01
Symbolic Reasoning
Formal verification, theorem proving, MDGs, HOL, SAT/SMT, symbolic simulation, runtime monitoring. Applied to neural networks and regulated decisions.
Explore sector →Sector 02
AI & Machine Learning
Neurosymbolic integration, explainable architectures, uncertainty quantification, abstention, LLM governance for high-stakes decisions.
Explore sector →Sector 03
Quantum HyperGraph
Hypergraph decision representations, quantum-accelerated search, quantum-symbolic verification. Frontier work, long-horizon.
Explore sector →Adjacent areas (mechanistic interpretability, control theory, program synthesis, probabilistic circuits, AI safety) are welcome if the framing connects back to accountability.
Copy this template into an email. Don't worry about polish — structure matters more than prose.
Hi Sam, I'd like to propose a research collaboration with QGI. 1. Research question (1–2 sentences): 2. Why it matters / who benefits: 3. What I bring to the collaboration: - Institution / lab: - My role: - Relevant prior work (links): 4. What I'm looking for from QGI: [ ] Co-authorship [ ] Technical advisory [ ] Compute or infra [ ] Funding / grant partnership [ ] PhD / postdoc mentorship [ ] Other (describe): 5. Timeline (start / key milestones / target venue): 6. Links (arXiv, Scholar, GitHub, personal site): Thanks,
Green flags
- A question someone can fail at — falsifiable, not survey-shaped.
- A clear division of labor — who writes, who runs experiments, who ships.
- A target venue or deliverable, even if it's informal (workshop, preprint, demo).
- Prior work you're proud of — we read it before replying.
Not a fit
- "Generic LLM wrapper" or "chatbot improvement" framings.
- Undergraduate capstone help or take-home homework.
- Paid write-my-paper requests — that's what consultants are for.
- Stealth startup validation disguised as research. Use the Enterprise track instead.
Actually more of an enterprise need? The other track ships faster.
Back to partnership tracks